Taking Pleasure In this Downfall of the Tories? That's Understandable – But Totally Wrong
There have been times when Tory figureheads have seemed moderately rational on the surface – and alternate phases where they have sounded completely unhinged, yet remained popular by party loyalists. This is not either of those times. Kemi Badenoch failed to inspire attendees when she spoke at her conference, even as she threw out the divisive talking points of anti-immigration sentiment she assumed they wanted.
The issue wasn't that they’d all awakened with a fresh awareness of humanity; rather they lacked faith she’d ever be equipped to implement it. Effectively, fake vegan meat. Conservatives despise that. One senior Conservative reportedly described it as a “themed procession”: boisterous, energetic, but nonetheless a farewell.
What Next for the Organization Having Strong Arguments to Make for Itself as the Most Historically Successful Political Organization in History?
Certain members are taking another squiz at one contender, who was a definite refusal at the outset – but with proceedings winding down, and everyone else has departed. Others are creating a buzz around Katie Lam, a young parliamentarian of the 2024 intake, who appears as a traditional Conservative while saturating her online profiles with border-control messaging.
Is she poised as the standard-bearer to beat back opposition forces, now surpassing the incumbents by 20 points? Can we describe for overcoming competitors by becoming exactly like them? Moreover, assuming no phrase fits, maybe we can use an expression from fighting disciplines?
When Finding Satisfaction In These Developments, in a How-the-Mighty-Are-Fallen Way, in a Serves-Them-Right-for-Austerity Way, It's Comprehensible – Yet Completely Irrational
It isn't necessary to consider overseas examples to understand this, or consult Daniel Ziblatt’s groundbreaking study, the historical examination: all your cognitive processes is emphasizing it. Moderate conservatism is the crucial barrier against the far right.
Ziblatt’s thesis is that democracies survive by keeping the “wealthy and influential” happy. Personally, I question this as an guiding tenet. One gets the impression as though we’ve been indulging the affluent and connected for decades, at the expense of everyone else, and they rarely appear sufficiently content to halt efforts to reduce support out of public assistance.
Yet his research goes beyond conjecture, it’s an archival deep dive into the pre-Nazi German National People’s Party during the Weimar Republic (in parallel to the England's ruling party around the early 1900s). When the mainstream right becomes uncertain, if it commences to chase the rhetoric and gesture-based policies of the far right, it cedes the direction.
We Saw Comparable Behavior Throughout the EU Exit Process
Boris Johnson aligning with Steve Bannon was a notable instance – but radical alignment has become so pronounced now as to overshadow all remaining Tory talking points. Where are the old-school Conservatives, who treasure continuity, conservation, legal frameworks, the UK reputation on the international platform?
Where did they go the modernisers, who portrayed the country in terms of powerhouses, not powder kegs? Let me emphasize, I had reservations regarding either faction either, but it’s absolutely striking how such perspectives – the one nation Tory, the modernizing wing – have been erased, replaced by ongoing scapegoating: of immigrants, Muslims, social support users and demonstrators.
They Walk On Stage to Music That Sounds Like the Theme Tune to Game of Thrones
And talk about issues they reject. They describe protests by older demonstrators as “displays of hostility” and display banners – British flags, English symbols, all objects bearing a vibrant national tones – as an clear provocation to those questioning that total cultural alignment is the ultimate achievement a person could possibly be.
There doesn’t seem to be any inherent moderation, encouraging reassessment with their own values, their traditional foundations, their own plan. Whatever provocation the Reform leader throws for them, they pursue. Consequently, no, there's no pleasure to see their disintegration. They are dragging social cohesion down with them.
